🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of nations are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that smartphones and apps are "robbing our children's youth". Legislation could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to enact a proposal raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic motion supporting a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it warns of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a useful starting point," stated the MEP supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in strong research".

Last year, support built behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after viewing disturbing online content suggests that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to design products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, action is largely occurring at the local government level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced measures mandating adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from certain figures to mimic Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Beyond these regions, further countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies strike a more nuanced stance. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might backfire". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

As this international debate evolves, the actions of the Australian government and its followers show that policymakers globally are less and less content to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.