🔗 Share this article

Industry experts have shown considerable skepticism regarding bullish claims that US energy majors will quickly pump tens of billions of dollars to rebuild the country's broken production facilities.

Demand for Solid Guarantees

Lacking an solid promise of complete repayment from the American government, experts believe international firms to act with extreme caution.

“It is too early to discuss any future business activities,” a spokesperson commented in response.

The optimistic timeline of less than 18 months has been boldly outlined. Yet, realistic assessments indicate a different picture.

A Likely Timeline

“It is likely going to take 36 months for any meaningful production bounce,” commented one chief investment officer.

Experts believe oil companies would likely spend:

• Year one: Securing new regulatory frameworks.
• Year two: Beginning rebuilding of infrastructure.
• Final phase: Starting to meaningfully increase output.

The result could be an rise of around half a million barrels per day perhaps by the end of the decade.

Appetite Compared to Willingness for Risk

Analysts draw a critical difference between multinationals’ interest and their appetite to invest heavily.

“I believe their attention is an high score, on a scale of one to 10. But their willingness is a four or five, because there is a lack of certainty yet.”

Veteran diplomats in the region reinforce this view. The expectation is that majors will politically express enthusiasm while privately acting with extreme caution.

The Vast Investment Required

The required outlay would be colossal. University estimates suggest that increasing production by between 500,000 and a million barrels per day would require in excess of $10 billion in investment over several years.

However, rebuilding output to previous levels of around 2.5 million bpd could require a staggering $80 billion to $90 billion over six or seven years.

The Pending Issue of Federal Guarantees

The prospect of oil giants being paid back by the government has been repeatedly floated. But, specific plans on this proposal have so far not been provided.

The absence of a solid plan is the main reason for the sector's caution. Companies seek guarantees against sovereign risk and the risk that a different administration could cancel any deal.

“They must be insured against nationalization, that we’ve seen in Venezuela before.”

Therefore, while political promises runs high, the operational challenges suggest a road of extreme caution for potential large-scale investment in the Venezuelan oil sector.